An Exegesis of Apostasy Embedded in John's Narratives of Peter and Judas Against the Synoptic Parallels (Studies in Bible & Early Christianity S. v. 6
By: Dongsu Kim (author)Hardback
2 - 4 weeks availability
So far, many works have been devoted to reconstructing the composition history of John's Gospel without paying attention to the literary unity thrust in the narratives of Peter and Judas who were probably two most influential figures of their time in radically opposite ways. This study serves to show how John would have understood them in his historical context, and thus affirms a well-known hermeneutic principle that a historical reconstruction must be born out from within the text rather than by imposing the interpreter's own frame of presuppositions. Recently, increasing number of scholars seem to be interested in dealing with the question of apostasy taught in the New Testament. However, few published works can be found with regard to the theme of apostasy embedded in the Johannine writings. The perennial debate between the Arminians and Calvinists over the question has been based on their respective systematic theological presupposition whether it emphasizes freedom of human will or God's predestination. J. Gundry Volf and B. J.
Oropeza have accomplished significant works of investigating Paul's teaching about apostasy and perseverance with the research methods of either topical-exegetical analysis (Gundry Volf) or socio-rhetorical-historical exegesis (Oropeza). This study of apostasy in the Johannine writings contributes to filling in the vacuum of scholarship regarding apostasy in the New Testament. In this study, a multidisciplinary approach has been taken - one that encompasses literary, historical, and theological exegesis. This method is taken from the frame of the diachronic analysis that interprets apostasy passages in John against the backdrop of the Synoptic parallels. John brings to light what the Synoptic accounts foreshadow with his literary art of interweaving the stories of Peter and Judas with the "deep structure" of apostasy. The comparison of Peter and Judas helps to discover that John's narratives fulfill a paraenetic function in the faith community that the believers should imitate Peter's perseverance. This study contributes not only to understanding the Johannine perception of apostasy but also illuminating on the historical situation of the Johannine community.
Dongsu Kim is Associate Professor of Bible and Theology at Nyack College in NYC. He was ordained in PCA, received Ph.D. in Biblical Hermeneutics from Westminster Theological Seminary, and serves as an assistant pastor in Central Presbyterian Church of New York. He translated Let the Reader Understand by Dan G. McCartney and C. Clayton and has written many articles including "Peter-Paul Cycle Embedded in Acts 11:19-12:25 and the Divine Necessity of the Gentile Evangelism."
Abbreviations, Foreword, Preface; 1. Introduction; 2. Peter in the Gospel of John; 3. Judas Iscariot in the Gospel of John; 4. The Anti-Apostasy Polemic in the Gospel of John; 5. The Anti-Apostasy Polemic in the Epistles of John; 6. Apostasy in the Jewish Writings; 7. Conclusion; Appendix; Bibliography; Index
Number Of Pages:
- ID: 9780773464049
- Saver Delivery: Yes
- 1st Class Delivery: Yes
- Courier Delivery: Yes
- Store Delivery: Yes
Prices are for internet purchases only. Prices and availability in WHSmith Stores may vary significantly
© Copyright 2013 - 2017 WHSmith and its suppliers.
WHSmith High Street Limited Greenbridge Road, Swindon, Wiltshire, United Kingdom, SN3 3LD, VAT GB238 5548 36