The International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of decisions of international courts and arbitrators as well as judgments of national courts. It is therefore an essential work of reference. Cases are drawn from every relevant jurisdiction - international and national. The volumes are prepared at the Lauterpacht Research Centre for International Law in the University of Cambridge. All decisions in other languages are translated into English. Because of the standing and scope of its coverage, the series is widely cited in judgments of international and national tribunals. No other publication provides a comparable coverage of case law in this field. The series should be an essential holding for every library providing even minimal international law coverage. These reports offer the most economical and efficient way of accessing the whole range of international case law.
1. Prosecutor v. Tadic (Judgment and Sentencing Judgment) (Cases IT-94-1-T and IT-94-1-T) [International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia; 2. Mabo v. Queensland (No 1) [Australia], 8/12/88; 3. Mabo v. Queensland (No 2) [Australia], 3/6/92+ Note on Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) + Wik decision (High Ct of Australia, 23/12/96); 4. Pareroultja and Others v. Tickner and Others [Australia], 20/9/93; 5. Walker v. State of New South Wales [Australia], 16/12/94; 6. State of Western Australia v. The Commonwealth [Australia], 16/3/95; 7. Narrainen v. Norway (Communication No. 3/1991) [United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination], 15/3/94; 8. Regina v. Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith [England] 7/6/95 (Div Ct QB) 3/11/95 (CA); 9. Toonen v. Australia (Communication No 488/1992 [United Nations Human Rights Committee], 31/3/94; 10. Grant v. South-West Trains Ltd. (Case C-249/96) [Court of Justice of the European Communities] 17/2/98.