The International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of decisions of international courts and arbitrators as well as judgments of national courts. Among the cases reported in volume 121 are two Malaysian High Court decisions and one ICJ decision, which all relate to the Cumaraswamy immunity case. Volume 121 also includes three important investment protection decisions, two of these under ICSID, and the full reporting of the S. D. Myers Inc. v. Canada (Partial Award (13 November 2000)) of NAFTA Arbitration Tribunal under the UNCITRAL Rules. A selection of both European and international human rights cases also feature, including the important ICTY torture case relating to Anton Furundzija. The remainder of the volume is taken up with national cases, mainly from the United States of America.
1. Azinian v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 01/11/99; 2. Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States [INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ADDITIONAL FACILITY)] 02/06/00; 3. S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada [NAFTA ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES] + NOTE (Procedural Order No 10 and explanatory note) 13/11/00; 4. McElhinney v. Ireland and the United Kingdom (Application No 31253/96) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GRAND CHAMBER)] + NOTE (Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom; Fogarty v. United Kingdom: Admissibility) 09/02/00; 5. Naletilic v. Croatia (Application No 51891/99) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FOURTH SECTION)] 04/05/00; 6. Prosecutor v. Anton Furundzija (Case IT-95-17/1) [INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA] 10/12/98 (Trial Chamber II) 21/07/00 (Appeals Chamber); 7. MBf Capital Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 28/06/97 (High Ct) 20/10/97 (Ct of Appeal); 8. Difference relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion) [INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE] 29/04/99; 9. Insas Bhd and Another v. Dato' Param Cumaraswamy [MALAYSIA] 07/07/00; 10. CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd and Others v. KPMG and Others [SOUTH AFRICA] 12/02/98; 11. Skeen v. Federative Republic of Brazil [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07/07/83; 12. Chisholm & Co. and Chisholm v. Bank of Jamaica and Barber [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 05/09/86; 13. Finzer and Others v. Barry and Others; Boos, Waller and Brooker v. Barry and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19/08/86 (Ct Apps) 22/03/88 (Sup Ct); 14. In re Mr and Mrs Doe; Mr and Mrs Doe v. United States of America [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 19/10/88; 15. First American Corporation and Others v. Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al-Nahyan and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 26/11/96; 16. United States of America v. Noriega [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 07/07/97; 17. United States of America v. Sissoko [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 03/09/97; 18. Alejandre v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; Mendez v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force; De La Pena v. Republic of Cuba and the Cuban Air Force [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 17/12/97; 19. Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA] 11/03/98.