Kwete - No!: The Veto of Four Per Cent of the Governed: the Ill-Fated Anglo-Rhodesian Settlement Agreement, 1969-1972

Kwete - No!: The Veto of Four Per Cent of the Governed: the Ill-Fated Anglo-Rhodesian Settlement Agreement, 1969-1972

By: Richard Wood (author)Paperback

In Stock

£29.25 RRP £45.00  You save £15.75 (35%) With FREE Saver Delivery


The adoption of the new republican constitution by the Rhodesian electorate in 1969 was intended to end the fruitless four-year-long negotiations with the British to secure recognition of the unilateral declaration of independence by Ian Smith on 11 November 1965. Given the evasion by significant nations of the trade sanctions imposed by the United Nations, the gamble was that this de facto recognition would become de jure. Formal recognition, needless to say, was unlikely because the framers of the 1969 constitution rejected the established aim of progress to majority rule through a qualified franchise. Instead they offered the Africans only the goal of parity of racial representation, despite the whites amounting to four per cent of the population. Accordingly, the 46-year-old non-racial common roll was replaced by a separate African roll and a 'European' one which included, incongruously, the small Asian and coloured populations for the purposes of the vote only. In addition, the African ability to qualify for the vote was governed by the ratio of income tax they paid in comparison with the 'Europeans'. Perhaps because this arrangement was certain to be unacceptable internationally, Ian Smith, the Rhodesian prime minister, welcomed a secret overture in 1970 from the new British Conservative government of Edward Heath to re-open the Anglo-Rhodesian negotiations. The British negotiating team, led by the lawyer, Lord Goodman, succeeded by November 1972 to secure an agreed compromise that restored the aim of eventual majority rule. The exiled Rhodesian African nationalist insurgents, the Zimbabwe African People's Union and the Zimbabwe African National Union, had adopted in 1962 the Marxist prescription of the armed struggle as the path to power. Their efforts, however, to ignite an armed insurgency and to make Rhodesia ungovernable were petering out by the time of the Anglo-Rhodesian settlement in late November 1972. It therefore fell to the African nationalists within Rhodesia, also bent on immediate African majority rule, to stymie the settlement effort. They succeeded because the British insisted from the outset that any settlement had to be endorsed by the majority of the people of Rhodesia. Because Ian Smith would not hold a referendum as it would mean conceding'one man one vote', the assessment of opinion was left to a British judicial commission led by Lord Pearce. The British insistence on 'normal political activity' during the test forced Smith to release from preventive detention a significant number of African nationalist activists. The leisurely formation of the commission allowed these activists sufficient time to organize a campaign of rejection, the result of which the Pearce Commission could not or chose not to ignore.

Create a review

About Author

Richard Wood was born in Bulawayo, Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). He is a graduate of Rhodes and Edinburgh universities. He was a Commonwealth Scholar and the Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Research Fellow at the University of Rhodesia and thereafter held a personal chair at the University of Durban-Westville, South Africa. He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and of the Alexandrian Defence Group. Fortunate to have sole access to the then closed papers of Sir Roy Welensky, he wrote The Welensky Papers: A History of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland: 1953-1963. Based again on sole access to the hitherto closed papers of Ian Smith and other private collections, he published the complementary works So Far and No Further! Rhodesia's Bid for Independence during the Retreat from Empire, 1959-1965 and A Matter of Weeks Rather than Months: The Impasse between Harold Wilson and Ian Smith; Sanctions, Aborted Settlements and War: 1965-1969. In the military history field, he has published: The War Diaries of Andre Dennison, Counter-Strike from the Sky: The Rhodesian All-Arms Fireforce in the War in the Bush: 1974-1980, Africa@War Volume 1: Operation Dingo: Rhodesian Raid on Chimoio and Tembue, 1977 and Volume 5: Zambezi Valley Insurgency: Early Rhodesian Bush War Operations. He has contributed chapters to other works: 'The Rhodesian issue in the historical perspective', in A.J. Venter's Challenge: Southern Africa in the Revolutionary Context, 'Fire Force' in Venter's The Chopper Boys: Helicopter Warfare in Africa and 'Countering the Chimurenga: The Rhodesian Counterinsurgency Campaign 1962-1980' in Daniel Marston's & Carter Malkasian's Counterinsurgency in Modern Warfare. He has also contributed articles and reviews to a variety of journals including the Journal of African Studies (Pretoria), Military Illustrated (London), the Marine Corps Gazette (Quantico), Small Wars and Insurgencies (London), Military History (Leesburg), The Journal of the Army Historical Research (London) and the Lion & Tusk (Southampton). From 1956-9 and 1970-80, he served in the 1st and 8th Battalions of the Rhodesia Regiment, and as second-in-command of the research section of the Mapping & Research Unit of the Rhodesian Intelligence Corps. He lives in Durban, South Africa.

Product Details

  • publication date: 28/01/2016
  • ISBN13: 9781910294970
  • Format: Paperback
  • Number Of Pages: 576
  • ID: 9781910294970
  • weight: 1429
  • ISBN10: 1910294977

Delivery Information

  • Saver Delivery: Yes
  • 1st Class Delivery: Yes
  • Courier Delivery: Yes
  • Store Delivery: Yes

Prices are for internet purchases only. Prices and availability in WHSmith Stores may vary significantly