Mormon and Asian American Model Minority Discourses in News and Popular Magazines (Mellen Studies in Journalism S. v. 8)

Mormon and Asian American Model Minority Discourses in News and Popular Magazines (Mellen Studies in Journalism S. v. 8)

By: Chiung Hwang Chen (author)Hardback

Special OrderSpecial Order item not currently available. We'll try and order for you.

Description

This book situates news and popular magazines' coverage of Asian Americans and Mormons within minority discourse, explains the discourses' problematic nature, and points out how the two discourses shape power relations between majorities and minorities in American society. Preface by Kenneth Starck No questions ignite debate in the United States more than those pertaining to differences in religion and ethnicity: Is religion an important consideration in how people regard one another? How significant is ethnicity in making one's way in America? In what ways do religion and ethnicity figure in how a person or group of persons fit into American society? How do media depict for us - that is, those of us on the outside - those who adhere to a different religion or those from a different racial or ethnic background? These are large questions and, as with large questions, probably unanswerable in any definitive way. But the questions are worthy of attention. How we think about them and on what basis helps determine the future of the country. Events of 9-11 and afterwards only intensify interest. Fortunately for us, Dr. Chiung Hwang Chen does not shirk the responsibility of a scholar to tackle tough issues. Her concern is with how media construct our images of minorities in this country. In terms of media, she looks at magazines. In terms of minorities, she focuses on Mormons and Asian Americans. Magazines, as a representative of media, make sense. But why Mormons and Asian Americans? Probably because she's a member of both minority groups. Her vantage point infuses her work in a way that lends plausibility and credibility to the contribution that she has made in advancing our understanding of minority groups in the United States. This book operates at several levels. Indirectly and most fundamentally, the book confronts the question of what is it to be an American. Or, to put it more precisely: What is it to be "Americanized?" In a way the question envelops the whole of the history of the United States. For what is the composition of this nation if not a rainbow of human colors and a kaleidoscope of hopes and dreams? At another level, the book addresses key issues of assimilation and enculturation. How do assimilation and enculturation occur? Or, do they? Assuming they do, is there a middle ground for people - yielding to assimilation yet maintaining group identity? Not a melting pot per se. But more of a tossed salad imagery, as some maintain, or, as others of a gustatory bent argue, a nation given to cross-cultural stir fry - different cultures influencing and being influenced by other cultures. This change in our thinking about assimilation portends a change in the way we perceive of assimilation. Though writing mainly about immigration and such contemporary phenomena as globalization and identity politics, Jacoby argues in favor of a new definition of assimilation that simultaneously embraces diversity and unity (Tamar Jacoby, ed., Reinventing the Melting Pot, 2004). Dr. Chen's examination of the experiences of Mormons and Asians would suggest that this re-definition has been taking place for sometime. At yet another and arguably more controversial level, Dr. Chen's book deals with the every-day concerns of any group that exists apart from the mainstream. How easily it is for us to associate Mormonism with polygamy - or the construction of a welfare system during the Great Depression that continues to be the envy of people everywhere. It is just as easy to think of Asians as representing the yellow peril - or academic and professional models of what we might like our own children to aspire to. Discrimination, prejudice, stereotype - how do these attitudes and behaviors come about? Do mass media play a role in their creation and perpetuation? Dr. Chen's work deals with all of these issues by examining the misfortunes and, ultimately, fortunes of two important minority groups in the United States. How these groups are portrayed in popular news magazines over the span of nearly six decades forms the basis of the study. In both cases, members of the minority groups, often vilified, not only overcome numerous obstacles to become successful in the larger social arena but to emerge as exemplars of comportment, role models for other groups. Hence, the term "model minorities," a complex and, as evident in Dr. Chen's discussion, a much misunderstood label. From an academic standpoint, the book will interest scholars from several disciplines, notably sociology and communication. Sociologists of immigration and assimilation will find fresh insights on how people different most others in religion and ethnicity cope with their environment. When and how perceptions of minority groups change over time have long been the subject of scholarly inquiry, and Dr. Chen contributes to this debate. Those interested in mass media, both as an academic enterprise as well as the production of content, will find much in this book to test their theories and practices. The book challenges the press to ask itself questions about the way it covers minorities, from the narrative or story-telling approach to the overall impact of culture on the practice of journalism. It shows how news and popular media, while not conspiratorial, unintentionally support interests in power. It echoes Lippmann's words written nearly a century ago: "For the most part we do not first see, and then define, we define first and then see" (Public Opinion, 1922, pp. 54-55). Dr. Chen's method of inquiry itself will spark debate. Employing critical discourse analysis, her concern is with meaning in a broad sense - culturally, historically, socially and interpretatively. She certainly is not objective, that is, producing results that are verifiable and reproducible. But she does not profess to be objective. She wants to challenge and question deeply embedded theories and practices. "Consciousness raising," in her words. In this and in other ways she succeeds admirably.

Contents

List of Tables iv; Acknowledgements v; Preface by Kenneth Starck vii; Introduction 1; Chapter 1. Journalistic Narrative and Critical Discourse Analysis; Journalism as Storytelling 7; The Question of Objectivity 13; Ideology in News Stories 15; Methodology: Critical Discourse Analysis 21; Elaboration of Method 27; Chapter 2. Early Mormon Images; Shaping the Mormon Image: The Early Stage, 1830-1850 34; Sharpening the Mormon Image: Early Utah Period, 1850-1890 39; The Evil Mormon 41; The Polygamous Mormon 46; Uneasy Accommodation: Post-Manifesto Period, 1890-1920s 57; Mormon Women 62; Mormons in Motion Pictures 63; Conclusion 64; Chapter 3. Mormon Model Minority Discourse; Mormon Image and Journalistic Discourse 67; Mormon Model Minority Discourse 70; Discourse in the 1930s 70; Discourse in the 1940s 75; Discourse in 1950s 82; Discourse in the 1960s 90; Discourse in the 1970s 101; Discourse in the 1980s 110; Discourse in the 1990s 122; Conclusion 131; Chapter 4. Early Asian American Image: The Yellow Peril; A Brief History of Early Chinese and Japanese Immigration 141; The Chinese Immigration 141; The Japanese Immigration 146; Early Asian (American) Stereotype: The Yellow Peril 150; Military Yellow Peril 150; Population Yellow Peril 155; Economic Yellow Peril 159; Cultural Yellow Peril 165; Racial Yellow Peril 169; Conclusion 176; Chapter 5. Asian American Model Minority Discourse; The Asian American Image and Journalistic Discourse 179; Discourse in the 1940s 181; Discourse in the 1950s 187; Discourse in the 1960s 194; Discourse in the 1970s 200; Discourse in the 1980s 205; Discourse in the 1990s 219; Conclusion 231; Conclusion. A Comparison and Some Suggestions for Media; Changes in the Discourse over the Decades Compared 238; Similarities in the Broad Discourse 240; Differences in the Broad Discourse: Liberalism vs. Conservatism 246; Similarities in the Discourse's Implications 247; Differences in the Discourse's Implications 250; Possible Alternatives to the Model Minority Discourse 254; Appendices; Appendix I 261; Appendix II 264; Bibliography 267; Index 285

Product Details

  • ISBN13: 9780773463752
  • Format: Hardback
  • Number Of Pages: 305
  • ID: 9780773463752
  • ISBN10: 0773463755

Delivery Information

  • Saver Delivery: Yes
  • 1st Class Delivery: Yes
  • Courier Delivery: Yes
  • Store Delivery: Yes

Prices are for internet purchases only. Prices and availability in WHSmith Stores may vary significantly

Close