Several recent studies have analyzed the theology of Southern Baptists and have attempted to classify the various Southern Baptist theologians into categories. Some writers have appealed to certain theologians as sources of authority or have vilified them by claiming that they have turned Baptists away from a biblical theology. This work seeks to examine how Southern Baptist Theologians, James Petigru Boyce, Walter Thomas Conner, Edgar Young Mullins, and Dale Moody have addressed original sin in order to critically analyze a specific doctrine that is important to Baptists. The author does not seek to politicize their views or determine which theological approach might be more profitable for Southern Baptists. The researcher provides a detailed analysis of each theologian's view, and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each view. The researcher then highlights the overall weaknesses of the views and suggests areas that Southern Baptist Theologians might need to address in more detail in order to formulate a more adequate doctrine of original sin.
Dr. Mark A. Gstohl is Assistant Professor of Theology at Xavier University of Louisiana. He received his Ph.D. in Systematic Theology and M.Div. from the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, and B.S. from Christian Brothers University. He has also taught at Union Baptist Theological Seminary in New Orleans.
Preface i; Acknowledgments vi; Introduction 1; Chapter 1 21; James Petigru Boyce: Individual Guilt Via Adam's Sin; Chapter 2 47; Edgar Young Mullins: Human Solidarity in Guilt Removed; Via Christ's Death; Chapter 3 73; Walter Thomas Conner: Human Solidarity in Sin Remedied; Via Christ's Death; Chapter 4 99; Dale Moody: Individual Guilt Illustrated Via Adam's Sin; Conclusion 125